Dimensions
32x188
Strings
64
Colors
12
Rate Pattern
1
0
20
100.0% (9 ratings)
11 Similar patterns
1 Photo
12 Comments
You have to be Logged in to post a comment. |
SimonM |
1 week, 6 days ago by SimonM
@MimiPlayz I can't remember the exact measurements but string L was around 3 m 40 cm half that if your not doing a loop, others that were around 3m 20cm were strings J and I the others around 2.9/3 m hope that was of some help
|
MimiPlayz |
2 weeks, 1 day ago by MimiPlayz
@SimonM thank you!! how long do you suggest i cut my strings?
|
SimonM |
2 weeks, 1 day ago by SimonM
Hi @MimiPlayz mine is 27cm.would like to see yours once it's done to see what colours you choose. Have fun 😊
|
MimiPlayz |
2 weeks, 1 day ago by MimiPlayz
@SimonM how long did your bracelet end up being? i want to make one myself
|
SimonM |
3 weeks, 5 days ago by SimonM
Good idea vicas next time I will put other items in to better show scale 👍
|
SimonM |
3 weeks, 5 days ago by SimonM
Thanks @vikas_daga. I'm really not sure how many hours I put into it in total. I would maybe do around and hour of knotting a day for two weeks. Got my eye on a few more of your parents 😄
|
vikas_daga |
1 month ago by vikas_daga
Absolutely beautiful again Simon, so nice to see some of these big designs become reality, and especially good when it's a really skilled person doing it. This is pretty striking I think. Yes the starting triangle is really hard to gauge with so many strings. I'd love to see a photo of all the big ones you've done together, with something for scale. Quite an impressive body of work. What was your total time on this including prep?
|
SimonM |
1 month, 1 week ago by SimonM
Hi @vikas_daga hope you don't mind me tagging you when I have made one of your fantastic patterns. This was my first and possibly last 65 string piece, I really enjoyed it. Tied the triangle start to tight giving the top triangle a slight dish but apart from that I'm happy with how it turned out
|
vikas_daga |
1 year, 8 months ago by vikas_daga
Sorry, below comment should read 159486, not 158846. Moderator or admin, some kind of limited window to edit comments would be helpful.
|
vikas_daga |
1 year, 8 months ago by vikas_daga
Just to clarify, if you look at 158846, you'll see the large diamonds that anchor the design at the top and bottom do not actually close, which means it's not clear how one should handle a triangle start (assuming you would make the two big diamonds the start and end points, which seems like the obvious choice). In this new implementation, there are clear and complete start and end points, with the required information to do a triangle start.
|